The Church
is within the world, and yet it can only properly fulfil its function when its
ultimate commitment is beyond the comprehension of the world. If the Church does not rest on a point
outside the world, then it has no leverage with the world. All its tugging and straining would become
just a minor disturbance within the life of the world. The Church has to bear witness to the
weakness and folly of a crucified Messiah.
That’s where we find our essential ‘raison d’ĂȘtre’ – and it means that
we overturn the accepted wisdom of the world.
We are to challenge what the world is saying. We are charged with the offering of God’s
alternative. But this doesn’t mean that
we are to find our safety in separation.
Indeed, that kind of otherworldliness is forbidden. We are not to inhabit a ghetto, but to go forth
on a mission. And the request is that
God will make sure that we are up to the task.
It’s interesting
to reflect on what it really means to be the church in the world. We claim the priority of unity, but we’re
actually far better at entrenched positions, at divisions and barriers than we
are at unity. We stress the value of
diversity. Actually, that’s quite
right. Diversity is a hugely important
part of the kaleidoscope that is the church.
In terms of Paul’s famous image of the Church as the body, it is not
just a counter to boredom that we should not all be legs, or eyes, or noses, or
whatever. It is absolutely
essential. But it is very easy to erode
the boundary between a broad and embracing diversity and a narrow and excluding
difference.
So what are we to be like? One commentator, Stephen Verney, puts it like
this: “Like the Father and the Son, they will let go everything and receive
everything back from each other. This
letting go and receiving back will be the rhythm of their lives; it will be an
openness to each other which allows the ambiguity of each one to come into the
light, and be accepted, and made whole, and become part of the community.”
The point is that God models how we should
be. If I were to ask you to describe
God, what are the words that you would choose? I imagine that it would be words like love and
grace and holy and forgiving and reconciling.
At the beginning of Genesis we read - 1:26 – Then God said, ‘And now
we will make human beings; they will be like us and resemble us.’ Let’s not pretend that it isn’t challenging
to be like God. It is. Jesus spells out the challenge in Matthew
5. Verse 48 – you must be perfect –
just as your Father in heaven is perfect.
We know that will only ever be an aspirational
statement. Yet aspirational statements
are worth having, so long as they are expressing that to which we truly aspire. I still have in my study a birthday card
received from my younger siblings on my 21st. It shows Charlie Brown of the Peanuts
cartoons contemplating life and making the comment: ‘There’s no heavier burden
than a great potential.’ With God’s
help, may we each realise our potential.
No comments:
Post a Comment